Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 44
ANDERSONE v. Latvia
ANDERSONE v. Latvia LVA 05/09/2019 00:00:00 16/09/2019 11:04:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52699
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 05/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the automatic order to return payments the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50539
CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. Italy
CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. Italy ITA 07/06/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Freedom of expression in particular to impart information: Failure to put in place an appropriate legislative and administrative framework to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28280
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
D.M.D. v. Romania
D.M.D. v. Romania ROU 03/01/2018 00:00:00 15/10/2018 13:01:15 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length and serious deficiencies in the judicial proceedings conducted between 2004 and 2012 on allegations of domestic violence by a father EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48703
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J-P.D.V. v. France
J P.D.V. v. France FRA 12/10/1994 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Excessive length of detention on remand as well as telephone conversations intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31362
KARWOWSKI v. Poland
KARWOWSKI v. Poland POL 19/07/2016 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: The dangerous detainee regime pursuant to Article 88 3 88a and 88b and 212 a of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences placement on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39941
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KORNAKOVS v. Latvia
KORNAKOVS v. Latvia LVA 15/09/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12618
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary HUN 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the asylum seeking applicants detention violations of Article 5 1 . In Lokpo and Tour Al Tayyar Abdelhakim and Said in 2009 and 2010 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10637