Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 120
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland POL 28/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of family and home: Degrading treatment by the police when determining the owner of an unlocked car parked in front of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39856
RADIKA PREVOZI DOO LJUBLJANA v. North Macedonia
RADIKA PREVOZI DOO LJUBLJANA v. North Macedonia MKD 21/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the property rights of the applicant professional transport company on account of the failure of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62933
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
RAMSAHAI AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 15/05/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an effective investigation into the killing of Moravia Ramsahai son and grandson of the applicants by a police officer. Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4523
RANTSEV v.Cyprus
RANTSEV v.Cyprus CYP 10/05/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour applied to trafficking in human beings: Death in ambiguous circumstances of the applicant s daughter who had travelled from the Russian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3203
RANTSEV v.Russia
RANTSEV v.Russia RUS 10/05/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour applied to trafficking in human beings: Death in ambiguous circumstances of the applicant s daughter who had travelled from the Russian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46253
REYNOLDS v. the United Kingdom
REYNOLDS v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to an effective remedy in the context of right to life: Lacking availability of civil proceedings to establish any liability and compensation due as regards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3019
S.D. v. the United Kingdom
S.D. v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/01/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention for failure to pay the community charge poll tax absence of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2440
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 26/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the hindrance by the authorities of the effective exercise by the applicant of his right of petition to the Court by failing to provide him with copies of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31622
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to the disclosure of the applicant s telephone records provided by the national landline EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47385
SAVVAIDOU v. Greece
SAVVAIDOU v. Greece GRC 31/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the principle of presumption of innocence on account of statements made in 2015 by the Government spokesperson following the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62510
SCHNEIDER v. Luxemburg
SCHNEIDER v. Luxemburg LUX 10/10/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of association and protection of property: Interference with the right to freedom of association as according to a law of 1925 the applicant was forced to enroll EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-133
SHANNON v. Latvia
SHANNON v. Latvia LVA 24/02/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by a regional court to examine promptly appeals against the extension of remand in custody. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31183
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
STORCK v. Germany
STORCK v. Germany DEU 16/09/2005 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful admission and detention of the applicant in a private psychiatric clinic on her father s request without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38374
STOYANOVA v. Bulgaria
STOYANOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 14/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the domestic courts to discharge their duty to ensure that a deadly attack which occurred in 2008 and was motivated by hostility towards EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61245
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 10/09/2019 00:00:00 22/10/2019 16:32:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns breaches of biological parents rights to family life due to decisions taken between 2011 and 2019 in the public child welfare EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54045
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of correspondence in detention: Unjustified monitoring by prison authorities of medical correspondence between the applicant a convicted prisoner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2804