Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: The case concerns certain shortcomings in the secret surveillance regime including bulk interception and obtaining communications data from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57685
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
GORMUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GORMUS AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants right to impart information on account of the search operation conducted in their workplace by the authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37344
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KOVESI v. Romania
KOVESI v. Romania ROU 05/08/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inability of the applicant the former Chief Prosecutor of the National Anticorruption Directorate DNA to challenge effectively the undue premature EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55693
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CHE 30/07/2019 00:00:00 23/08/2019 14:58:08 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant who was executing a prison sentence for violent crimes and undergoing a psychiatric treatment in the security wing of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52647
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569