Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 105
GUVEN v. Turkey
GUVEN v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicant complained i.a. about his eviction from his village and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28681
H.K. v. Finland
H.K. v. Finland FIN 26/12/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to take formal decisions when placing a child in emergency care and inability of the applicant to contest access restrictions. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4770
IMMOBILIARE PODERE TRIESTE S.R.L. v. Italy
IMMOBILIARE PODERE TRIESTE S.R.L. v. Italy ITA 16/02/2007 00:00:00 09/11/2016 12:07:22 Case Description: Recourse to indirect expropriation a practice of emergency occupation of land by local administrative authorities without any formal expropriation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34196
INCE AND OTHERS v. Turkey
INCE AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28715
IORGA v. Romania
IORGA v. Romania ROU 25/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to excessive court fees. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16139
IOSIF AND OTHERS v. Romania
IOSIF AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 20/03/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the excessive amount of a security deposit required to bring an action to cancel a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16477
JERET v. Estonia
JERET v. Estonia EST 09/06/2020 00:00:00 03/07/2020 16:09:18 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate use of handcuffs on a prisoner during his stay in prison hospital. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55521
K. AND T. v. Finland
K. AND T. v. Finland FIN 12/07/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in public care under emergency and normal orders failure to reunite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4794
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
KONTROVA v. Slovakia
KONTROVA v. Slovakia SVK 24/09/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Right to life and effective remedy: Authorities failure to protect the lives of two children despite their mother s criminal complaint and emergency calls concerning her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8449
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L.M. v. Slovenia
L.M. v. Slovenia SVN 12/09/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful involuntary confinement in the closed wards of the Idrija and Ljubljana Psychiatric Hospitals and the open ward EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7414
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns the ill treatment inflicted by prison officers on the applicant during a prison riot in 2016 violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: An action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60329
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LUPSA v. Romania
LUPSA v. Romania ROU 08/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Unlawful expulsion proceedings: Interference with the applicants private life resulting from expulsion measures for security reasons without legal basis breach of procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17395
M.A.K. v. the United Kingdom
M.A.K. v. the United Kingdom GBR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life and effective remedy: Medical treatment of a child in a public hospital in particular conducting tests without parental consent prevention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2947
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571