Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 27
A.S. v. Poland
A.S. v. Poland POL 23/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand under a bill of indictment and its prolongation on the basis of a fax from the Supreme Court lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17841
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BORIS POPOV v. Russia
BORIS POPOV v. Russia RUS 28/01/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns monitoring of both private and privileged correspondence notably with the lawyer by the prison authorities Article 8 in the Tomsk Region in 2008 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13825
GEORGAKOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece
GEORGAKOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 19/12/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2020 14:46:31 Case Description: Functioning of justice and lack of an effective remedy: Delayed compliance of the municipality with a judicial decision recognising the applicants as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55231
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland
HOWALD MOOR v. Switzerland CHE 11/06/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Restriction of the applicant s access to court on account of the ten year limitation period for asbestos related EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5878
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom
KEENAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/04/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Suicide of a mother s mentally ill son in prison due to lack of adequate care and due to disciplinary segregation measures imposed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2462
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KRSTIC v. Serbia
KRSTIC v. Serbia SRB 10/03/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to enforce a the final and enforceable administrative decision of the Serbian Pension and Disability Insurance Fund ordering supplementary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8651
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
MUSO v. Italy (no. 1)
MUSO v. Italy no. 1 ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 13:59:35 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38166
PECK v. the United Kingdom
PECK v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy: Disclosure in the media by a local council of an individual s photographs taken by a CCTV camera installed in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2236
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246