Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 127
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal PRT 04/07/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings before the courts of first instance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47457
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Inability of a father to exercise his contact rights in relation to his son during the course of excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37108
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. Spain
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. Spain ESP 16/04/2018 00:00:00 11/06/2018 17:16:50 Case Description: Right to private and family life home: Failure of local authorities to take action to stop excessive nocturnal noise above the permissible levels from bars pubs etc. in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49559
CVIJETIC v. Croatia
CVIJETIC v. Croatia HRV 26/05/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of home: Excessive delay with regard to the execution of eviction orders in respect of the applicant s flat EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10075
DEWICKA v. Poland
DEWICKA v. Poland POL 04/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings and of the subsequent enforcement proceedings the impossibility to enter into a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17839
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
DZEMYUK v. Ukraine
DZEMYUK v. Ukraine UKR 04/12/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Protection of private and family life home / Functioning of justice: Unlawful interference on account of the construction and use of a cemetery in vicinity of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25474