Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 294
KONOVALOVA v. Russia
KONOVALOVA v. Russia RUS 16/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful presence of medical students during the birth of the applicant s child resulting from the lack of sufficient procedural safeguards in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27896
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 28/06/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:41:35 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment due to the excessive use of force by law enforcement officers and lack of an effective and independent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37428
KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. Norway
KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Denial of access to a court due to the excessive length of the proceedings before the Norwegian Industrial Property Office NIPO and its Board of Appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-209
KUIBISHEV v. Bulgaria
KUIBISHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/12/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand and lack of a prompt presentation to a judge as well as lack of effective judicial review of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14309
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine
KUROCHENKO AND ZOLOTUKHIN v. Ukraine UKR 11/02/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: The case concerns the failure of the authorities to take all steps available to them to advance the examination of criminal proceedings pending against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56939
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus CYP 15/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:41:38 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings: Lack of impartiality of a tribunal sentencing the applicant an advocate to 5 days imprisonment in 2001 for contempt of court while he was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12607
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LABSI v. Slovakia
LABSI v. Slovakia SVK 24/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and co operation with the ECHR: expulsion of an Algerian national convicted in France for preparing a terrorist act despite a real risk of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7703
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LAFARGUE v. Romania
LAFARGUE v. Romania ROU 13/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Non enforcement of court decisions granting visiting rights with regard to minor children: failure to take appropriate or sufficient measures to ensure access to and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17514
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary
LASZLO MAGYAR v. Hungary HUN 13/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants life sentences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10897
LEITNER v. Austria
LEITNER v. Austria AUT 08/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to private and family life: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47123
LEONIDOV v. Ukraine
LEONIDOV v. Ukraine UKR 22/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: The case concerns rejection of the applicant s appeal in cassation due to the confusion by the higher court as to which legislation was in force. In particular in 2007 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61191
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 22/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicant landowners the lessors and the leaseholders the lessees notably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-207
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland FIN 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the forced use of sealed overalls on two prisoners while in isolation that is from 13 to 16 November and from 9 to 16 May 2004 respectively. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6008
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland CHE 09/02/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and discrimination: Discrimination with regard to a binational couple s choice of surname. Article 14 in conjunction with 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4744