Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 22
AKAR v. Turkey
AKAR v. Turkey TUR 21/09/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unjustified interference of prison authorities with the applicants correspondence in general due to the lacking clarity of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35071
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
CRETOI v. the Republic of Moldova
CRETOI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 14/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns excessively lengthy proceedings under the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction violation of Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59215
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/09/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful production of tape recordings made from covert listening equipment in the homes of the applicants and in one case lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2872
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/05/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of adequate medical care in detention inadequate detention conditions or insufficient consideration of detainees state of health by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39907
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ v. Spain
MARTINEZ MARTINEZ v. Spain ESP 18/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Failure of authorities to put an end to the adverse effects of the exposure to night noises from a discotheque situated in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5756
MODESTOU v. Greece
MODESTOU v. Greece GRC 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: The case concerns a search in the applicant s home and business premises in the framework of a preliminary criminal investigation. The Court held that although the search had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47823
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia ARM 17/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an aggressive homophobic campaign against the applicant a well known member of the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender LGBT community in Armenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60993
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RIBIC v. Croatia
RIBIC v. Croatia HRV 02/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to enforce a parent s contact rights with his child. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10227
SANTANDREA v. Italy
SANTANDREA v. Italy ITA 12/04/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness of the applicants detention for approximately 30 hours after the judge competent for the preliminary investigation had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45112
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TORREGGIANI AND OTHERS v. Italy
TORREGGIANI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 27/05/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:28:45 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Conditions of detention resulting mainly from a structural problem of overcrowding in Italian prison facilities in view of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45036
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844