Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 87
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of independent and effective investigation into the deaths the applicants relatives Iraqi nationals during operations conducted by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3013
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia SRB 16/07/2014 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:12:28 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to inability of the applicant a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina to recover old foreign currency savings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
AUGUSTO v. France
AUGUSTO v. France FRA 11/04/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the failure to communicate to the applicant the expert opinion of the doctor appointed by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33195
BANEL v. Lithuania
BANEL v. Lithuania LTU 18/09/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigation resulting in failure to establish the responsibility of the administrative authorities for the accidental death of a thirteen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4363
BARTENBACH v. Austria
BARTENBACH v. Austria AUT 20/06/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length and unfairness of criminal administrative proceedings for illegally employing a foreign citizen breach of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-549
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BERNOBIC v. Croatia
BERNOBIC v. Croatia HRV 21/09/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure of the Constitutional Court to speedily decide on the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as a fresh decision extending EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12343
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 01/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the demolition of the applicant company s construction work on an expropriated site EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37158
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden SWE 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: This case concerns the alleged risk that the applicant foundation s communications had been or would be intercepted and examined by way of signals intelligence as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57667
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
COTTIN v. Belgium
COTTIN v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings for assault due to the establishment of an expert medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1415
CSOMA v. Romania
CSOMA v. Romania ROU 15/04/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life: Medical procedure necessary due to pregnancy complications leading to permanent inability to bear children carried out without the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17564
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974