Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 162
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
BUDIMIR v. Croatia
BUDIMIR v. Croatia HRV 09/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his dismissal from work as a certified motor vehicle inspector due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60381
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CAPIN v. Turkey
CAPIN v. Turkey TUR 15/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Dismissal of a daughter s request for paternity establishment as out of the statutory limitation period without allowing her to plead the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54621
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden SWE 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: This case concerns the alleged risk that the applicant foundation s communications had been or would be intercepted and examined by way of signals intelligence as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57667
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. Armenia ARM 16/06/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: The case concerns six Azerbaijani nationals who were forced to flee from their homes during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-353
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
COTTIN v. Belgium
COTTIN v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings for assault due to the establishment of an expert medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1415
CSOMA v. Romania
CSOMA v. Romania ROU 15/04/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life: Medical procedure necessary due to pregnancy complications leading to permanent inability to bear children carried out without the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17564
DORAN v. Ireland
DORAN v. Ireland IRL 31/10/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:15:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of domestic proceedings and the need for an effective remedy. Articles 6 and 13 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3233
DUBUS S.A. v. France
DUBUS S.A. v. France FRA 11/09/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: denial of a fair hearing due to the lack of independence and impartiality of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33273
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia RUS 05/08/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55759