Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 221 - 240 of 258
SURIKOV v. Ukraine
SURIKOV v. Ukraine UKR 26/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful collection retention and use of sensitive obsolete and irrelevant data concerning the applicant s mental health in considering his application EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46989
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
T.K. v. Lithuania
T.K. v. Lithuania LTU 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Unfair trial on the grounds of the applicant s inability to examine key witnesses in particular his partner in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50985
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TRIVKANOVIC v. Croatia (no. 2)
TRIVKANOVIC v. Croatia no. 2 HRV 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts manifestly unreasonable refusal to reopen civil proceedings against the State seeking EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57593
TSENTR 'UKRASA' v. Ukraine
TSENTR UKRASA v. Ukraine UKR 25/11/2021 00:00:00 03/12/2021 09:55:36 Case Description: These cases concern the violation of the principle of legal certainty resulting from the reassessment and overruling of the decisive circumstances established by final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58943
TSERKVA SELA SOSULIVKA v. Ukraine
TSERKVA SELA SOSULIVKA v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts refusal to recognise their jurisdiction in proceedings against the regional EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31346
TSMOKALOV v. Ukraine
TSMOKALOV v. Ukraine UKR 03/11/2022 00:00:00 14/11/2022 14:58:48 Case Description: The case concerns an error of the applicant s diagnosis and as a consequence an inappropriate medical treatment which took place in state hospitals in 2001 and 2002 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61860
TUMELIAI v. Lithuania
TUMELIAI v. Lithuania LTU 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/04/2018 17:08:01 Case Description: These cases concern decisions by the domestic courts ordering the applicants to demolish/alter constructions they had built on the basis of lawful construction permits EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49341
TUNIS v. Estonia
TUNIS v. Estonia EST 19/03/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:41:35 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor conditions in Tallinn prison amounting to degrading treatment Status of Execution: The applicant was released in 2009. The Minister of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37432
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
UKRAINE-TYUMEN v. Ukraine
UKRAINE TYUMEN v. Ukraine UKR 22/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Arbitrary deprivation of bona fide owners of their possessions in the Ukraine Tuymen case part of the company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31330
UNGVARY AND IRODALOM KFT. v. Hungary
UNGVARY AND IRODALOM KFT. v. Hungary HUN 03/03/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts conviction of a historian and a publisher for defamation and award of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10983
URH v. Croatia
URH v. Croatia HRV 13/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right on account that he had been prosecuted and tried twice for the same offence before the Minor Offences Court in 2011 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59405
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262