Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 161 - 180 of 258
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the quashing of the applicant s acquittal and his conviction by the Supreme Court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6764
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia
OGANEZOVA v. Armenia ARM 17/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an aggressive homophobic campaign against the applicant a well known member of the lesbian gay bisexual and transgender LGBT community in Armenia EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60993
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia ARM 11/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference on account of the expropriation of land for mining without addressing the issue of whether the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51635
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OZBEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
OZBEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/01/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unnecessary interference due to the refusal of the first instance courts and the Court of Cassation to grant the applicants time to amend the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37224
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 28/05/2018 11:38:33 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Domestic courts refusal without any specific reasons of the applicant s request for a hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49543
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PANYIK v. Hungary
PANYIK v. Hungary HUN 12/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the applicant s legitimate doubt as to the impartiality of the tribunal as the judge in charge of the appeal had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10975
PARDO CAMPOY AND LOZANO RODRIGUEZ v. Spain
PARDO CAMPOY AND LOZANO RODRIGUEZ v. Spain ESP 14/01/2020 00:00:00 17/01/2020 18:25:44 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before the court of appeal which examined on appeal both EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54585
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PFENNING DISTRIBUTIE S.R.L. v. Romania
PFENNING DISTRIBUTIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 06/10/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: No punishment without law: Failure by the domestic courts to retrospectively apply the more lenient criminal law during proceedings against the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56055
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine
PLAKHTEYEV AND PLAKHTEYEVA v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of property rights and functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court to claim damages for a wrongful fine and the unjustified seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31124