Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
ANDI MARIUS IONESCU v. Romania
ANDI MARIUS IONESCU v. Romania ROU 29/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicant in 2014 for abusive conduct following criminal proceedings in which he was not given the opportunity at any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60035
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian authorities to effectively pursue adequate and timely actions to enforce the first and third applicants custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47553
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
COLLOREDO MANNSFELD v. the Czech Republic
COLLOREDO MANNSFELD v. the Czech Republic CZE 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair restitution proceedings due to the lack of the opportunity for the parties to comment on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46465
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey TUR 12/11/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of association: Interference with the exercise by municipal civil servants of their right to form a trade union and to negotiate collective agreements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5500
GOULANDRIS AND VARDINOGIANNI v. Greece
GOULANDRIS AND VARDINOGIANNI v. Greece GRC 16/09/2022 00:00:00 28/10/2022 11:08:42 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the first applicant s right not to be tried or punished twice on account of the imposition in 2004 of an administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61684
HAMMERN v. Norway
HAMMERN v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in that suspicions were expressed in a court decision dealing with compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-181
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
PEERS v. Greece
PEERS v. Greece GRC 19/04/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / Conditions of detention in Korydallos men s prison and interference with correspondence. Articles 3 and 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22152
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SEJDIC AND FINCI v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/12/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern discrimination against the applicants on account of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3141
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary HUN 06/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group concerns the violation of the applicants right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence on account of the Hungarian legislation on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10745
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania LTU 07/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified refusal in 2015 to exempt conscientious objector a Jehovah s witness from compulsory military service and the unavailability of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61139
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657