Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 41
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: The case concerns violations suffered by the applicant a former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Georgia during his pre trial detention in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48437
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants right to respect for their private and family life which has been violated as a result of lustration violation of the Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54941
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 19/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant against a uniformed police reservist who on unauthorised leave of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6660
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary HUN 06/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group concerns the violation of the applicants right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence on account of the Hungarian legislation on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10745
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of correspondence in detention: Unjustified monitoring by prison authorities of medical correspondence between the applicant a convicted prisoner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2804
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CHE 30/07/2019 00:00:00 23/08/2019 14:58:08 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant who was executing a prison sentence for violent crimes and undergoing a psychiatric treatment in the security wing of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52647
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TIM HENRIK BRUUN HANSEN v. Denmark
TIM HENRIK BRUUN HANSEN v. Denmark DNK 09/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Authorities failure to obtain fresh evidence by an external expert opinion when reviewing the necessity of continuing safe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54073
TURAN CAKIR v. Belgium
TURAN CAKIR v. Belgium BEL 10/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Ill treatment by the police during arrest and custody and lack of effective investigation in this respect. Failure of authorities to examine whether racist motives played EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1525
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569