Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 257
A. B. AND C. v. Ireland
A. B. AND C. v. Ireland IRL 16/12/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:13:19 Case Description: Access to lawful abortion: lack of any implementing legislative or regulatory regime providing an accessible and effective procedure allowing access to lawful abortion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3231
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicant company s right of access to court from 1997 to 2005 because of the domestic courts refusal to examine its claim for damages on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3803
AKPINAR v. Turkey
AKPINAR v. Turkey TUR 18/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of ill treatment on account of the authorities failure to provide any plausible explanation for refusing to remove a life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52316
AL-NASHIF v. Bulgaria
AL NASHIF v. Bulgaria BGR 20/09/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Lack of protection against arbitrariness in expulsion proceedings based on national security grounds: failure of the authorities to ensure independent supervision of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14665
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALEXE v. Romania
ALEXE v. Romania ROU 03/08/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of an adversarial trial in civil proceedings due to the fact that the last instance court based its decision on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12728
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
ANAGNOSTOU-DEDOULI v. Greece
ANAGNOSTOU DEDOULI v. Greece GRC 16/12/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:42:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non compliance or delayed compliance with domestic court judgments ordering the lifting of land expropriation orders EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15139
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian authorities to effectively pursue adequate and timely actions to enforce the first and third applicants custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47553
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
APOSTOLOVI v. Bulgaria
APOSTOLOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 07/02/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate infringement of the first applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possession due to the domestic courts failure in 2009 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54757
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116