Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 198
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2019 00:00:00 08/03/2019 16:14:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to ensure the applicant s access to this daughter in the light of the child s mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51675
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BOLAT v. Russia
BOLAT v. Russia RUS 05/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns two violations of the Convention relating to unlawful actions by executive authorities: The first violation relates to the freedom of movement of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13741
BOLJEVIC v. Croatia
BOLJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 30/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the confiscation for failing to declare foreign currency at the border of the sums concerned by customs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47149
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 19/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists as a result of their convictions to administrative penalty in criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1909
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
CANADY v. Slovakia
CANADY v. Slovakia SVK 30/03/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative authorities. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7911
CANADY v. Slovakia (no. 2)
CANADY v. Slovakia no. 2 SVK 20/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8143
CEFERIN v. Slovenia
CEFERIN v. Slovenia SVN 16/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Failure of domestic courts to provide relevant and sufficient justification when fining a defence lawyer for contempt of court following certain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49389
CHAMBAZ v. Switzerland
CHAMBAZ v. Switzerland CHE 05/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the fines imposed on the applicant by the tax authorities on the ground that he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5838
CHITIC v. Romania
CHITIC v. Romania ROU 14/01/2020 00:00:00 17/01/2020 18:25:44 Case Description: The case concerns the unjustified interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression as a result of a domestic court s decision of July 2012 to hold him liable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54575
CHMELIR v. the Czech Republic
CHMELIR v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Justified doubts with regard to the objective impartiality of a High Court judge who in a second set of proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6088
CHORBOV v. Bulgaria
CHORBOV v. Bulgaria BGR 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian Ministry of Agriculture and Forests to pay the applicant his entire fee for legal work violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49423
COLOMBANI AND OTHERS v. France
COLOMBANI AND OTHERS v. France FRA 25/09/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction of the daily newspaper Le Monde its director and a journalist on the basis of the 1881 Press Law for insulting a foreign Head of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33169
DANEV v. Bulgaria
DANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 02/12/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Dismissal of a claim for non pecuniary damage for unlawful detention on excessively formalistic grounds as the domestic court required to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14852
DE ALMEIDA AZEVEDO v. Portugal
DE ALMEIDA AZEVEDO v. Portugal PRT 23/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of a politician in criminal libel proceedings to pay a fine and damages to a mayor he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9643
DELI v. the Republic of Moldova
DELI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 22/01/2020 00:00:00 21/02/2020 14:20:07 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of impartiality of the court on account of the fact that in June 2006 the applicant was fined for contempt of court by the same judge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54813
DELTA PEKARNY A.S. v. the Czech Republic
DELTA PEKARNY A.S. v. the Czech Republic CZE 02/01/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Disproportionate interference in the rights of the applicant company due to the search of its property by the competition authorities in 2003 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39