Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 198
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal PRT 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of two lawyers for defamation L.P. and for attacking a person s honour Carvalho in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52983
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LILIAN ERHAN v. the Republic of Moldova
LILIAN ERHAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns the unfairness of the trial against the applicant for drink driving finalised by a fine in 2015 because of the refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61479
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal PRT 28/12/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant s conviction for defamation following the publication of an editorial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9425
M. AND M. v. Croatia
M. AND M. v. Croatia HRV 03/12/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of family life: Lack of prompt and effective investigation into allegations of child abuse and domestic violence first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10155
M.P. v. Finland
M.P. v. Finland FIN 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the conviction of defamation for voicing concerns in a confidential conversation with a social worker about the possible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46477
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan AZE 18/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicant journalists in all cases due to in particular to the unjustified use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1709
MAMERE v. France
MAMERE v. France FRA 07/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of a politician in criminal proceedings to pay a fine as well as damages for statements he made during a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33029
MAMIDAKIS v. Greece
MAMIDAKIS v. Greece GRC 11/04/2007 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to imposition of customs fines of an amount endangering the applicant s financial situation. Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22808
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADOV JALALOGLU v. Azerbaijan AZE 11/04/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1759
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the disproportionate interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions in criminal proceedings between 2004 and 2011 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39477
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/10/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of Article 6 1 of the Convention and the right to an impartial tribunal as the same judge in 2009 who applied a disciplinary penalty as consequence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20620
MASAEV v. the Republic of Moldova
MASAEV v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 12/08/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Freedom of religion and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified interference with the applicant s right to freedom of religion as a result EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6830
MATYTSINA v. Russia
MATYTSINA v. Russia RUS 27/06/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to equality of arms in criminal proceedings on account of the unfair handling of expert evidence which put the defence at a significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14052
MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA, LDA v. Portugal
MEDIPRESS SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA LDA v. Portugal PRT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:49:23 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of the applicants in civil or criminal proceedings to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45765
MERCAN AND OTHERS v. Switzerland
MERCAN AND OTHERS v. Switzerland CHE 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal conviction of Turkish applicants for having publicly rejected the legal characterisation as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48419
MIHALACHE v. Romania
MIHALACHE v. Romania ROU 08/07/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:43:07 Case Description: Right not to be tried or punished twice: Breach of the ne bis in idem principle due to the higher prosecutor s decision to reopen of his own motion criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52597
MIJUSKOVIC v. Montenegro
MIJUSKOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 21/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to make adequate and effective efforts to execute custody decisions and reunite the applicant with her children. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11170