Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 198
RADOBULJAC v. Croatia
RADOBULJAC v. Croatia HRV 28/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the decision to fine a lawyer in civil proceedings for contempt of court without relevant and sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10071
RAICHINOV v. Bulgaria
RAICHINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 20/07/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the sentencing of a high rank official following ex officio prosecution to a fine and a public reprimand for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14631
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey TUR 10/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to their conviction under former Anti terrorism Law and/or seizure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30234
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal
REIGADO RAMOS v. Portugal PRT 22/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to take adequate and sufficient action to enforce the applicant s right of access to his daughter born in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9579
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. Slovakia (no. 4)
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA A.S. v. Slovakia no. 4 SVK 23/12/2021 00:00:00 27/01/2022 16:01:33 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate imposition of administrative fine in 2012 2015 on a multimedia publishing house by the Slovak EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59483
ROCA BULGARIA AD v. Bulgaria
ROCA BULGARIA AD v. Bulgaria BGR 03/05/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case concerns a disproportionate confiscation in 2012 2013 of the entire consignment of goods of the applicant company in addition to the fine imposed on it for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60231
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
SADOCHA v. Ukraine
SADOCHA v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Interference due to the disproportionate confiscation of the entirety of applicant s undeclared funds by the customs authorities. Article 1 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54059
SALIHOGLU v. Turkey
SALIHOGLU v. Turkey TUR 21/01/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to criminal convictions to pay fines for possessing publications which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5604
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain ESP 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability of the applicant to have a higher court review the imposition of a fine for an offence which although classified as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56051
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 30/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a fine on a commercial company by the State Consumer Rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49465
SERIF v. Greece
SERIF v. Greece GRC 14/03/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the convictions of the applicants who had been elected as muftis by part of the Muslim Greek community for usurping the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22180
SHANNON v. the United Kingdom
SHANNON v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/01/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right no to incriminate oneself due to the applicant s conviction in 1999 of the offence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2860
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
SHVETS v. Ukraine
SHVETS v. Ukraine UKR 23/07/2019 00:00:00 23/07/2019 17:45:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the authorities failure to enforce domestic judgments relating to granting custody or access rights to minor children between 2009 2021 violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52615
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Absence of a possibility for the applicant company to have the imposition of a fine by the labour court reviewed. Article 2 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57
SILIADIN v. France
SILIADIN v. France FRA 26/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Slavery and forced labour: Lack of specific and effective protection against servitude in criminal law resulting to the recruitment of a minor Togolese citizen as an unpaid EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33243