Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 40
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AL AKIDI v. Bulgaria
AL AKIDI v. Bulgaria BGR 31/10/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length and unlawfulness of detention on remand and lack of its judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14261
ALAJOS KISS v. Hungary
ALAJOS KISS v. Hungary HUN 20/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Electoral rights: Illegitimate restriction of voting rights due to their indiscriminate removal without individualised judicial evaluation solely on the grounds of mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10509
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BOJILOV v. Bulgaria
BOJILOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/03/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Problems related to pre trial detention unlawful continued detention pending trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14864
CALMANOVICI v. Romania
CALMANOVICI v. Romania ROU 01/10/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Cases mainly concerning irregularities of detention: unjustified extension of the detention on remand lack of immediate appeal against court decisions extending detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16415
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic
CERVENKA v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/01/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 12:47:30 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Placement in a social care home without sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness and possibility to seek compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46183
DANOV v. Bulgaria
DANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 26/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention remand and about being placed under house arrest without legal possibility to challenge its lawfulness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14689
EVGENI IVANOV v. Bulgaria
EVGENI IVANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of pre trial detention and failure to bring the applicant promptly before a judge as well as deficiencies in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14790
HORYCH v. Poland
HORYCH v. Poland POL 17/07/2012 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and private and family life: The dangerous detainee regime pursuant to Article 212a of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences placement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39925
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARWOWSKI v. Poland
KARWOWSKI v. Poland POL 19/07/2016 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: The dangerous detainee regime pursuant to Article 88 3 88a and 88b and 212 a of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences placement on a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39941
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine UKR 15/08/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31569
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
M. v. Germany
M. v. Germany DEU 10/05/2010 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Retroactive application of criminal legislation: unlawful retrospective extension of ordering of preventive detention Sicherungsverwahrung of dangerous criminals after they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38400