Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BAYATYAN v. Armenia
BAYATYAN v. Armenia ARM 07/07/2011 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Conviction to prison of conscientious objectors Status of Execution: The applicants were released on parole and their criminal records erased in 2006 i.e. even before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-391
CETINKAYA v. Turkey
CETINKAYA v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s director of a human rights association right to freedom of association on account of his conviction under former Article 37 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37419
D.S. v. the United Kingdom
D.S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/06/2021 00:00:00 15/07/2021 10:21:13 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the past disclosure of the applicant s criminal record pursuant to a regime in force until May EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58145
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 07/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and lack of effective remedy: Dismissal of requests to delete convictions under former Article 209 of the Criminal Code sexual relations of a male EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1107
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FELLONI v. Italy
FELLONI v. Italy ITA 06/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant sentenced on a charge of driving while unfit through drink to a one month suspended prison term and a fine of 900 00 euros appealed before the Court of Appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55405
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M.M. v. the United Kingdom
M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/04/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Unlawful interference with private life: indefinite retention and disclosure of data regarding a police caution for child abduction received by the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3007
M.P. v. Finland
M.P. v. Finland FIN 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the conviction of defamation for voicing concerns in a confidential conversation with a social worker about the possible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46477
MADER v. Croatia
MADER v. Croatia HRV 21/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Inhuman treatment inter alia by sleep and food deprivation while in police custody in the absence of any official EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10103
MIZIGAROVA v. Slovakia
MIZIGAROVA v. Slovakia SVK 14/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the health and well being of the applicant s husband of Roma origin who allegedly committed suicide while in police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8003
MORAR v. Romania
MORAR v. Romania ROU 07/10/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Criminal conviction and civil liability of a journalist working for a satirical weekly for defamation against the political adviser to an electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17578
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia
NIKOLYAN v. Armenia ARM 03/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the declaration the applicant legally incapable in 2013 following proceedings brought by his wife and son. The Court found that the applicant could neither EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54709