Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
ALIEV v. Georgia
ALIEV v. Georgia GEO 13/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention/protection against ill treatment: Degrading conditions of detention in Prison No. 5 of Tbilisi alleged ill treatment inflicted by prison and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5814
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands
CAMP AND BOURIMI v. the Netherlands NLD 03/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Impossibility to establish retroactively the applicant s relationship with his late father who died before he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4469
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CERNAK v. Slovakia
CERNAK v. Slovakia SVK 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: failure to guarantee adequate review of lawfulness of detention as the applicant s representatives had limited possibilities to consult the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7705
CETINKAYA v. Turkey
CETINKAYA v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s director of a human rights association right to freedom of association on account of his conviction under former Article 37 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37419
DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. Belgium
DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. Belgium BEL 06/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Right to life and protection of rights in detention: Suicide of the applicants son while he was unlawfully detained in the ordinary wings of a prison in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1203
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
GSELL v. Switzerland
GSELL v. Switzerland CHE 08/01/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to a journalist s prohibition to enter the Davos World Economic Forum WEF as the measure had not been prescribed by law. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4736
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
IVANOV v. Ukraine
IVANOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The cases of the present group concern the unjustified restriction to the right to liberty of movement in connection with the undertaking not to abscond given by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31094
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 22/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicant landowners the lessors and the leaseholders the lessees notably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-207
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine (no. 2)
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 11/09/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom and inhuman conditions of the applicant s detention during the hearing. Article 3 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32287