Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 50
A.B. v. Slovakia
A.B. v. Slovakia SVK 04/06/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to present one s case on equal terms with the defendant in that without a formal and reasoned decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7855
ACCIARDI & CAMPAGNA v. Italy
ACCIARDI CAMPAGNA v. Italy ITA 19/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Individual measures: proceedings on just satisfaction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28212
AKVARDAR v. Turkey
AKVARDAR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s inability to obtain the compensation due for expropriation of land which had belonged to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54933
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy
BELVEDERE ALBERGHIERA SRL v. Italy ITA 30/08/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Property rights: Resort to indirect expropriation a practice of emergency occupation of land by local administrative authorities pursuant to Law No. 85 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28192
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
CARBONARA AND VENTURA v. Italy
CARBONARA AND VENTURA v. Italy ITA 30/05/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Individual measures: proceedings on just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28180
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CWIK v. Poland
CWIK v. Poland POL 05/02/2021 00:00:00 25/02/2021 08:53:01 Case Description: Admission of evidence obtained through ill treatment of a third party by private individuals in the criminal proceedings against the applicant in 2008 violation of Article 6 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56721
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
D.M.D. v. Romania
D.M.D. v. Romania ROU 03/01/2018 00:00:00 15/10/2018 13:01:15 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length and serious deficiencies in the judicial proceedings conducted between 2004 and 2012 on allegations of domestic violence by a father EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48703
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
F.S. v. Italy
F.S. v. Italy ITA 18/05/1998 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Individual measures: proceedings on just satisfaction are still EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28176
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344