Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
I.S. AND OTHERS v. Malta
I.S. AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 18/03/2021 00:00:00 30/03/2021 16:37:50 Case Description: This case concerns mainly the failure of the authorities despite numerous expert reports and recommendations as well as the Family Court s orders issued at the initial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57055
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
M.D. AND M.A. v. Belgium
M.D. AND M.A. v. Belgium BEL 19/04/2016 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of the deportation of a Russian couple of Chechen origin to the Russian Federation failure to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1260
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569