Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 461 - 480 of 1132
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia
JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 22/11/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:53:14 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22998
JELICIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
JELICIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 31/01/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Case closed. Main measures adopted: All domestic judgments were enforced. Article 27 of the Law on Settlement of Obligations arising from Old Foreign Currency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4141
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia SRB 17/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of different types of judicial proceedings civil family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7031
JEVTIC v. Austria
JEVTIC v. Austria AUT 24/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of their convictions of drug offences in 2015 on the basis of evidence obtained as a result EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62516
JEVTOVIC v. Serbia
JEVTOVIC v. Serbia SRB 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s inhuman treatment by prison guards during four incidents between June 2007 and December 2011. It concerns also the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54991
JOANNOU v. Turkey
JOANNOU v. Turkey TUR 12/03/2018 00:00:00 04/04/2018 15:18:40 Case Description: The European Court found that in this particular case the Immovable Property Commission set up in 2005 did not act with coherence diligence and appropriate expedition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49213
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of impartiality of the commanding officer deciding on the necessity of a soldier s detention playing a central role in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2496
JOVICIC v. Croatia
JOVICIC v. Croatia HRV 21/06/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and the lack of an effective remedy. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12008
JUCYS v. Lithuania
JUCYS v. Lithuania LTU 08/04/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to prolonged inability of an innocent owner to recover possessions seized in criminal proceedings furs despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4239
JULIN v. Estonia
JULIN v. Estonia EST 29/08/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment on account of confinement to a restraint bed in Tartu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3043
JURICIC v. Croatia
JURICIC v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: This case concerns an unfair trial due to domestic court s failure in civil proceedings between 2009 and 2016 to assess the legal effect of a preliminary real estate purchase EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62028
JUSZCZYSZYN v. Poland
JUSZCZYSZYN v. Poland POL 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s suspension from exercising judicial duties by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court in February 2020 for issuing an order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62639
K. AND T. v. Finland
K. AND T. v. Finland FIN 12/07/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in public care under emergency and normal orders failure to reunite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4794
K.J. v. Poland
K.J. v. Poland POL 01/06/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to facilitate reunion between the applicants and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20638
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway NOR 15/04/2020 00:00:00 29/04/2020 09:24:01 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decisions to only allow the applicants contact with their child four or six EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55133
KABOGLU AND ORAN v. Turkey
KABOGLU AND ORAN v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to respect for private life on account of the authorities failure to protect the applicants privacy against infringements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51873
KADUSIC v. Switzerland
KADUSIC v. Switzerland CHE 09/04/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 14:29:04 Case Description: This case concerns an institutional therapeutic measure ordered in August 2012 by a court against the applicant a convicted prisoner suffering from a mental disorder a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50037
KAKABADZE AND OTHERS v. Georgia
KAKABADZE AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 02/01/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice freedom of assembly and right of appeal in criminal matters: Arbitrary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5832
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KALENDER v. Turkey
KALENDER v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2010 00:00:00 12/01/2018 11:58:24 Case Description: These cases mainly concern a violation of the right to life of the applicants who were exposed to a life threatening injury Toptanis or the applicants relatives who died in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37316