Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 881 - 900 of 1132
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia
ROSTOMASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 08/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern unfair criminal proceedings and trial against the applicants. In particular the Rostomashvili case concerns the failure by the authorities to give EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51447
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine UKR 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Right to appeal in criminal matters: Refusal owing to the unforeseeable application of certain rules of criminal procedure of the applicant s request for leave to appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48169
ROTH v. Germany
ROTH v. Germany DEU 22/01/2021 00:00:00 15/02/2021 16:49:34 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s degrading treatment on account of eleven intrusive strip searches he was subjected to in 2014 2017 prior to or after receiving visitors in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56713
ROZSA v. Hungary
ROZSA v. Hungary HUN 28/07/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court s decisions resulting in the applicants inability to seek compensation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10501
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland
RUOTSALAINEN v. Finland FIN 16/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Violation of the right not to be punished twice as the applicant found to be driving with more leniently taxed fuel than the diesel oil his van should have been running EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5972
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
RYABYKH v. Russia
RYABYKH v. Russia RUS 03/12/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14074
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
S. AND MARPER v. the United Kingdom
S. AND MARPER v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/12/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Details of this case together with status of execution can be found under the case of Gaughran GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom coe.int EXEC 61958 gbr, EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2206
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 12/09/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty on account of the revision of a final county court judgment by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12718
S.C. CARBOCHIM S.A. CLUJ-NAPOCA AND S.C. FENEGA IMPORT-EXPORT S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. CARBOCHIM S.A. CLUJ NAPOCA AND S.C. FENEGA IMPORT EXPORT S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right of access to a court due to the fact EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45915
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania
S.C. SCUT S.A. v. Romania ROU 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: The case concerns the imposition in 2009 of mining royalties to a private company dealing with sand extraction which was found to be arbitrary on account of lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50377
S.D. v. Greece
S.D. v. Greece GRC 11/09/2009 00:00:00 23/11/2016 17:14:42 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Unlawful detention of asylum seekers unaccompanied minors and irregular migrants and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-40767
S.W. v. the United Kingdom
S.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 22/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the failure to let the applicant a social worker meet allegations of professional misconduct made by a Family Court judge in 2014 during a trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58567
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SAARISTO AND OTHERS v. Finland
SAARISTO AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 12/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the applicants convictions to fines in criminal proceedings for dissemination of information violating EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5990
SABALIC v. Croatia
SABALIC v. Croatia HRV 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns discrimination against the applicant due to the failure of the domestic authorities to effectively discharge their procedural obligation under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57443
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 06/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities refusal to return the bodies of the applicants relatives who were local insurgents and were killed during anti terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13934