Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
G.W. v. the United Kingdom
G.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/09/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of independence and impartiality of the court martial system convened under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2528
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of Navy court martial criminal proceedings resulting in convictions due to the courts lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2232
JURJEVS v. Latvia
JURJEVS v. Latvia LVA 15/09/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31214
LAVENTS v. Latvia
LAVENTS v. Latvia LVA 28/02/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31170
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: The case concerns violations suffered by the applicant a former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Georgia during his pre trial detention in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48437
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia RUS 10/02/2021 00:00:00 03/03/2021 17:11:43 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56743
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2022 00:00:00 06/10/2022 13:27:56 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61369
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND YASHIN v. Russia RUS 20/04/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:01:00 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-24942
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/05/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 16:43:37 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49511
NAVALNYY v. Russia
NAVALNYY v. Russia RUS 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50807
NAVALNYY v. Russia (no. 2)
NAVALNYY v. Russia no. 2 RUS 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52759
NAVALNYYE v. Russia
NAVALNYYE v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner and popular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49187
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569