Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 35
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BOCHAN v. Ukraine (No. 2)
BOCHAN v. Ukraine No. 2 UKR 05/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil and criminal review proceedings before the Supreme Court following initial judgments of the European Court Bochan No. 1 Yaremenko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31248
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey
CENGIZ KILIC v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Inability of a father to exercise his contact rights in relation to his son during the course of excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37108
EXEL v. the Czech Republic
EXEL v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing and infringement of defence rights in property restitution proceedings and in bankruptcy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6096
FARANGE S.A. v. France
FARANGE S.A. v. France FRA 13/10/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the participation of the Government Commissioner in the deliberations of the Conseil d Etat. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32857
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
G.W. v. the United Kingdom
G.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/09/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of independence and impartiality of the court martial system convened under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2528
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of Navy court martial criminal proceedings resulting in convictions due to the courts lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2232
HUBKA v. the Czech Republic
HUBKA v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/05/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing in civil proceedings due to the lack of opportunity to comment on documentary evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6404
HUSEYIN TURAN v. Turkey
HUSEYIN TURAN v. Turkey TUR 04/06/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of certain criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5576
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285