Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
GAZSO v. Hungary
GAZSO v. Hungary HUN 16/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of judicial proceedings in civil criminal and administrative matters and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10875
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
KHAYLO v. Ukraine
KHAYLO v. Ukraine UKR 13/02/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: These cases concern procedural violations of Article 2 of the Convention on account of the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives caused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33459
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 19/07/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The seven remaining applicants in this group the former Ilgar Mammadov group are human rights defenders civil society activists and a journalist. They were all the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50875
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: This case concerns the State s failure to redeem the 1982 State loan bonds which are in the applicants possession. The Court observed that in 1995 Russia had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50975