Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 64
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
CANCIOVICI AND OTHERS v. Romania
CANCIOVICI AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 24/09/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the court of appeal s dismissal of the applicants claim claims concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16011
CESNULEVICIUS v. Lithuania
CESNULEVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 10/04/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life and lack of effective investigation: Death of the applicant s son in prison following repeated attacks by other inmates due to the authorities failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4334
CLAES v. Belgium
CLAES v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Extension of the Court of Cassation s competence in the absence of any statutory provision governing connected offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1409
COEME AND OTHERS v. Belgium
COEME AND OTHERS v. Belgium BEL 19/10/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings against a former Minister before the Court of Cassation under a constitutional provision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1381
CORBET v. France
CORBET v. France FRA 19/06/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness of detention from the expiry of police custody until presentation before a judge at the time of the events there had been no EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32893
CREANGA v. Romania
CREANGA v. Romania ROU 23/02/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Deprivation of liberty of a suspect without legal basis his remand in pre trial detention following the Procurator General s application EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16623
CUTEAN v. Romania
CUTEAN v. Romania ROU 02/03/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:30:30 Case Description: Unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant due to his inability to be confronted with the witnesses in the presence of the judge who ultimately decided the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17613
D.D. v. Lithuania
D.D. v. Lithuania LTU 09/07/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair guardianship proceedings concerning the mentally incapacitated applicant s request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4336
DANILA v. Romania
DANILA v. Romania ROU 08/06/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of a hearing of the accused before the Supreme Court of Justice reversing the acquittal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16085
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
ERDOGAN GOKCE v. Turkey
ERDOGAN GOKCE v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression and to impart information: disproportionate interference due to the conviction to a prison sentence for a candidate in municipal elections for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37236
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. the Czech Republic
EREMIASOVA AND PECHOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 16/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Failure of the authorities to protect life health and well being of persons in detention: Death of a relative in an attempt to escape from a police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6298
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GLADYSHEVA v. Russia
GLADYSHEVA v. Russia RUS 03/06/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants property rights on account of the decisions taken by the domestic authorities between 2008 and 2017 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14032
GROSARU v. Romania
GROSARU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Just satisfaction paid. The impugned law was repealed and replaced by Law no. 208/2015. In the current system there are two autonomous bodies competent in the electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13081