Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 221 - 240 of 482
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the authorities refusal in the period 2006 2012 to expropriate the applicants two plots of land. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47151
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L.B. v. Lithuania
L.B. v. Lithuania LTU 14/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal to re issue alien s passport in 2018 to a long term resident of Chechen origin ex beneficiary of subsidiary protection on the grounds that he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61257
L.E. v. Greece
L.E. v. Greece GRC 21/04/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour: Authorities failures with regard to their positive obligations due to shortcomings in response to criminal complaint of human EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15626
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LACATUS v. Switzerland
LACATUS v. Switzerland CHE 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: Interference with private life: imposition of a fine in 2014 on a vulnerable Roma person for having begged followed by imprisonment for five days for non payment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57455
LEARY v. the United Kingdom
LEARY v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2586
LEAS v. Estonia
LEAS v. Estonia EST 06/06/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lacking access to a covert surveillance file leading to the charges and conviction. Failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3105
LELAS v. Croatia
LELAS v. Croatia HRV 20/08/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Unlawful interference with right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Dismissal of the applicants claims for daily allowances for work in demining operations as time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12463
LEXA v. Slovakia
LEXA v. Slovakia SVK 23/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand following the revocation of amnesties granted by the Prime Minister s predecessor. Article 5 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7901
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
LISICA v. Croatia
LISICA v. Croatia HRV 25/05/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the fact that domestic courts used certain evidence against the applicants which was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10283
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2622
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine
LOGVINENKO v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31240
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 04/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Conditions of detention: Detention regime in a maximum security prison EBI including very stringent security measures the combination of which with routine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4525
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland CHE 09/02/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and discrimination: Discrimination with regard to a binational couple s choice of surname. Article 14 in conjunction with 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4744