Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 221 - 240 of 326
PECA v. Greece (n° 2)
PECA v. Greece n 2 GRC 10/09/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to the Court of Cassation due to the dismissal of his appeal on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15609
PELTEREAU-VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland
PELTEREAU VILLENEUVE v. Switzerland CHE 28/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of terms used by the prosecutor in his decision to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5870
PERETYAKA v. Ukraine
PERETYAKA v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of the High Administrative Court s to consider certain cassation appeals as being lodged out of time despite their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31218
PETKOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
PETKOSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 05/06/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court by the rejection of a cooperative members claim due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6480
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETYO POPOV v. Bulgaria
PETYO POPOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/04/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the fact that the accused or his lawyer were not informed of the date of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3801
PICHKUR v. Ukraine
PICHKUR v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:31:54 Case Description: Discrimination with regard to property rights: Entitlement to the pension dependent on the retired person s place of residence resulting in the applicant s deprivation of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15011
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 18/03/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:37:05 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23422
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47013
PISKIN v. Turkey
PISKIN v. Turkey TUR 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national courts to conduct an in depth thorough examination of the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57513
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia LVA 09/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Electoral rights: Infringement due to the striking off the list of candidates for parliamentary elections in 1998 of a citizen belonging to the Russian speaking minority on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31162
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POITRIMOL v. France
POITRIMOL v. France FRA 23/11/1993 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court and thus of a fair trial on account of the declaration of inadmissibility ipso jure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32907
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
POROWSKI v. Poland
POROWSKI v. Poland POL 21/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 16:43:24 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of correspondence: Excessive length of detention on remand due to unjustified extensions without relevant and sufficient grounds and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47381
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain ESP 18/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to interception of the applicant s telephone communication in the context of criminal investigations on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3485
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia
PRAVEDNAYA v. Russia RUS 30/03/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the quashing of final court decisions delivered in the applicants favour on account of newly discovered circumstances these most often being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13583
PROSHKIN v. Russia
PROSHKIN v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful detention of persons of unsound mind during and after criminal proceedings against them in different regions between 2003 and 2006 violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13767
QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. v. Albania
QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. v. Albania ALB 30/03/2005 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce a final judicial decision ordering compensation payment on the ground that the State allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-323
R.M.S. v. Spain
R.M.S. v. Spain ESP 18/09/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of family and private life: Failure to secure the applicant s right to live with her child due to her placement in a foster family on account of the mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3553