Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 221 - 240 of 516
KHOROSHENKO v. Russia
KHOROSHENKO v. Russia RUS 30/06/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the right to respect family life on account of restrictions during the first ten years of detention on family visits from 1999 until 2009 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13875
KIM v. Russia
KIM v. Russia RUS 17/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns different violations related to the detention of stateless or foreign national applicants between 2010 and 2020 pending administrative removal from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14160
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOM, SPOLOCNOST S RUCENÍM OBMEDZENÝM v. Slovakia
KOM SPOLOCNOST S RUCEN M OBMEDZEN M v. Slovakia SVK 02/09/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: The present case concerns a disproportionate restriction on the applicant company s right of access to a court as a result of the refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58335
KONYV-TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary
KONYV TAR KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the three applicant companies de facto exclusion in 2013 from the school book distribution contracts and the end of their business after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51883
KOSMOPOULOU v. Greece
KOSMOPOULOU v. Greece GRC 05/05/2004 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of family life Status of Execution: The child reached majority. Amendment of Article 691 4 of Civil Procedure Code by Article 16 1 of Law 4055/2012 provides for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22270
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOVALEV v. Russia
KOVALEV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms in civil proceedings initiated by or against the applicants in detention on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13621
KOYCHEV v. Bulgaria
KOYCHEV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/01/2021 00:00:00 09/03/2021 15:06:29 Case Description: This case concerns the dismissal in 2016 of an action challenging paternity on the grounds of the interests of the child who had been recognised by the mother s husband EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56823
KOZUL AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KOZUL AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of enforcement proceedings pending since 2002 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54115
KREBS v. Germany
KREBS v. Germany DEU 20/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant charged with a criminal offence to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law violation of Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55463
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 14/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering four EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49047
KUTIC v. Croatia
KUTIC v. Croatia HRV 01/06/2002 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to legislation of 1996 and 1999 staying all civil proceedings concerning claims for damages in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12139
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KUTLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the authorities refusal in the period 2006 2012 to expropriate the applicants two plots of land. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47151
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LABERGERE v. France
LABERGERE v. France FRA 26/12/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Cassation Court s excessive formalism declaring the applicant s appeal on points of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31517
LADENT v. Poland
LADENT v. Poland POL 18/06/2008 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention disproportionate to the aim of securing the proper conduct of criminal proceedings delays in release from detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39865