Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
ALEXOV v. Bulgaria
ALEXOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor detention conditions and/or restrictive penitentiary regimes applied in respect of the applicants lack of effective remedy and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3639
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
DVOYNYKH v. Ukraine
DVOYNYKH v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:35:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Poor conditions of detention and inadequate access to medical care in police holding facilities pre trial detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28340
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
HEGLAS v. the Czech Republic
HEGLAS v. the Czech Republic CZE 09/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of private life: Interference due to unlawful acts carried out by the authorities in criminal investigations: obtaining extracts from the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6212
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
MIKHEYEV v. Russia
MIKHEYEV v. Russia RUS 26/04/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns deaths torture or inhuman and degrading treatment while in police custody in various regions of Russia in 1998 2017 and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14082
NENCHEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
NENCHEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 18/09/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the death of 15 children and young adults between 15 December 1996 and 14 March 1997 in a home for children with severe mental disabilities in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3965
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
VINTMAN v. Ukraine
VINTMAN v. Ukraine UKR 23/01/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern an unjustified interference with the applicants right to respect for family life owing to the authorities systematic refusal between 2001 and 2017 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31610