Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 167
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 30/06/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases of this group concern breaches to the right to presumption of innocence of the first applicant in the case of Petrov and Ivanova and of the applicant in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3571
POIROT v. France
POIROT v. France FRA 15/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal of a civil party s appeal against the investigating judge s order to send a case concerning her allegation of sexual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33071
PONTES v. Portugal
PONTES v. Portugal PRT 24/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of the authorities to take measures enabling regular contact of parents with their son placed in an institution and lack of relevant and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9731
PRANJIC-M-LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PRANJIC M LUKIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 02/09/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities interference with the applicant s right to respect for his private life due to his subjection in 2013 to involuntary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56345
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION 'ETICA' v. Romania
PROFESSIONAL PUBLIC NOTARY ORGANISATION ETICA v. Romania ROU 24/07/2018 00:00:00 16/08/2018 15:03:14 Case Description: In December 2007 police officers proceeded without any order issued by a prosecutor to a search at the applicant organisation s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50091
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia RUS 18/02/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unlawful eviction of the applicant from a flat after the death of her late partner who held tenancy rights to the flat. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27530
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland
RACHWALSKI AND FERENC v. Poland POL 28/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of family and home: Degrading treatment by the police when determining the owner of an unlocked car parked in front of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39856
RICCOBONO v. France
RICCOBONO v. France FRA 03/08/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unjustified interference on account of the house searches and seizures the applicant was subject to during a customs investigation. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33003
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109
ROUSK v. Sweden
ROUSK v. Sweden SWE 25/10/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property and to respect of his private and family life and his home due to the sale of his property at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2164
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SAINT-PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. Luxembourg
SAINT PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. Luxembourg LUX 18/07/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with a newspaper company s right to respect for home and freedom of expression search and seizures in the offices of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-163
SALIHIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SALIHIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 06/02/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful placement in a social care home without a decision of the competent civil court. Article 5 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48889
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SLAVOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SLAVOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 10/02/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / protection of private life / presumption of innocence: Degrading treatment due to the psychological effects of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3949
SOBIESKI-CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SOBIESKI CAMERZAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2018 00:00:00 16/02/2018 14:47:48 Case Description: Protection of private life and home and lack of effective remedy / protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unlawful seizure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48927