Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 167
SOCIETE COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. France
SOCIETE COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. France FRA 16/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unjustified interference due to the applicant company s premises having been searched and documents seized as part of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33135
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STANKOVA v. Slovakia
STANKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of home: Disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to respect for her home following her eviction without being offered alternative accommodation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8105
STEFAN STANKOV v. Bulgaria
STEFAN STANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful placement of the applicant suffering from a mental disorder in a social care home lack of judicial remedy to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1926
SURUGIU v. Romania
SURUGIU v. Romania ROU 10/11/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private life / home: Failure of authorities to stop incursions into the applicant s courtyard by third parties who were granted title to the adjoining plot of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16083
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T. v. the United Kingdom
T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicants inability minors aged 10 at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2452
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825
TASE v. Romania
TASE v. Romania ROU 10/09/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: unlawful placement in detention on remand and lack of pertinent and sufficient reasons for extending detention on remand as well as lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13087
TATAR v. Romania
TATAR v. Romania ROU 06/07/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:34:15 Case Description: Protection of private family life and home: Breach by the State of its obligations to assess risks and consequences of hazardous industrial process and to keep the public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17620
TATISHVILI v. Russia
TATISHVILI v. Russia RUS 09/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Freedom of movement and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful refusal to register the applicant as resident at her home address and failure by domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13641
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of regulation of home birth resulted in a situation incompatible with the notion of foreseeability and lawfulness. Therefore the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11570
TILLACK v. Belgium
TILLACK v. Belgium BEL 27/02/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches and seizures at a journalist s home and place of work in the context of criminal investigations following the publication of confidential EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1519
TULESHOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TULESHOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants property right due to the inadequate compensation for their eviction Art. 1 Prot. 1 and of their right to home due to the delay in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13683
TURAN v. Hungary
TURAN v. Hungary HUN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unlawful search of a lawyer s law office by the police and seizure of documents concerning one of her clients who had been suspected of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11116
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom
V.C.L. AND A.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/07/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to take operational measures in line with international standards to protect two minors who were prosecuted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58063
VAN ROSSEM v. Belgium
VAN ROSSEM v. Belgium BEL 09/03/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference due to unlimited searches in the applicant s home and companies based on the imprecise wording of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1397
VARGA v. Romania
VARGA v. Romania ROU 01/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / protection of home: Unlawfulness of the applicants detention on remand after committal for trial and the expiry of the prosecutor s order EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16217
VINKS AND RIBICKA v. Latvia
VINKS AND RIBICKA v. Latvia LVA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference on account of a search of the applicants home and seizures carried out by a special anti EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55329