Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
BORGERS v. Belgium
BORGERS v. Belgium BEL 30/10/1991 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due to the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1297
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
DE BRABANDERE v. Belgium
DE BRABANDERE v. Belgium BEL 03/01/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of opportunity for the applicants to respond to the conclusions of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1329
DECOOPMAN v. Belgium
DECOOPMAN v. Belgium BEL 08/09/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair disciplinary proceedings due to the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1377
E.V.H. v. Belgium
E.V.H. v. Belgium BEL 23/09/1994 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the participation of a representative of the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1331
ESCOBAR LONDONO AND OTHERS v. Belgium
ESCOBAR LONDONO AND OTHERS v. Belgium BEL 27/09/1995 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lack of opportunity for the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1335
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to discharge their positive obligation to protect the applicant from ill treatment while he was under their full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55845
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
N. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental health conditions substantive violation of Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59831
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
S.P.R.L. ANCA ET AL v. Belgium
S.P.R.L. ANCA ET AL v. Belgium BEL 18/05/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the participation of a representative of the prosecutor s office in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1373
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
ULENS v. Belgium
ULENS v. Belgium BEL 11/02/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of transmission to the applicant of the Advocate General s conclusions and due to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1347
VAN ORSHOVEN v. Belgium
VAN ORSHOVEN v. Belgium BEL 25/06/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings in disciplinary matters on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1339
VAN WIJCK v. Belgium
VAN WIJCK v. Belgium BEL 25/08/1994 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1317
VEREECKEN v. Belgium
VEREECKEN v. Belgium BEL 27/06/1995 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lacking right to reply at the hearing to the opinion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1341
VERMEULEN v. Belgium
VERMEULEN v. Belgium BEL 20/02/1996 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due to the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1327