Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 128
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine
SHVYDKA v. Ukraine UKR 30/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:26:32 Case Description: The Shvydka case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to her conviction and sentence to ten days detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37062
SIZAREV v. Ukraine
SIZAREV v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to ensure the applicant s safety in detention in the Yevpatoriya Temporary Detention Facility ITT administered by the police in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31128
STEFEK v. Croatia
STEFEK v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive costs of civil proceedings which the applicant was ordered to pay by the Osijek County Court in February 2017 as a result of a civil action the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60405
STOWARZYSZENIE WIETNAMCZYKOW W POLSCE 'SOLIDARNOSC I PRZYJAZN' v. Poland
STOWARZYSZENIE WIETNAMCZYKOW W POLSCE SOLIDARNOSC I PRZYJAZN v. Poland POL 02/05/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of freedom of association and lack of effective domestic remedy: Denial of an effective remedy in respect of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46749
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61031
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
ULENS v. Belgium
ULENS v. Belgium BEL 11/02/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of transmission to the applicant of the Advocate General s conclusions and due to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1347
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
VAN ORSHOVEN v. Belgium
VAN ORSHOVEN v. Belgium BEL 25/06/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings in disciplinary matters on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1339
VAN WIJCK v. Belgium
VAN WIJCK v. Belgium BEL 25/08/1994 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1317
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593
VEREECKEN v. Belgium
VEREECKEN v. Belgium BEL 27/06/1995 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lacking right to reply at the hearing to the opinion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1341