Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 380
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BILGEN v. Turkey
BILGEN v. Turkey TUR 09/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the absence of sufficient procedural guarantees including a judicial review mechanism in the proceedings before the Council of Judges and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57913
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
BOKOVA v. Russia
BOKOVA v. Russia RUS 16/07/2019 00:00:00 23/08/2019 14:58:08 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a proper judicial review of the confiscation measures imposed on the applicants property in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52645
BOLAT v. Russia
BOLAT v. Russia RUS 05/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns two violations of the Convention relating to unlawful actions by executive authorities: The first violation relates to the freedom of movement of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13741
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of a suspect s defence rights due to the presence of a police officer during the first consultation with his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2596
BRISC v. Romania
BRISC v. Romania ROU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 15:10:37 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s reprimand and consequent removal from the office of chief prosecutor in 2009 as a result of a disciplinary action instituted him on charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51829
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUDIMIR v. Croatia
BUDIMIR v. Croatia HRV 09/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his dismissal from work as a certified motor vehicle inspector due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60381
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine UKR 17/12/2020 00:00:00 18/12/2020 10:22:22 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive burden on the applicant company imposed by the actions of the authorities through the re classification in 2008 of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56505
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia HRV 26/07/2018 00:00:00 19/10/2018 11:50:30 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Excessive burden on the applicants due to certain requirements of reimbursement including statutory interest payments imposed on them in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50581
CALDARELLA v. Italy
CALDARELLA v. Italy ITA 22/01/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: due to the application of limitations to the applicant s personal capacity deriving from his being registered as bankrupt EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43275