Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 147
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. TOTALGAZ INDUSTRIE S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the recalculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54303
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain ESP 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability of the applicant to have a higher court review the imposition of a fine for an offence which although classified as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56051
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 30/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a fine on a commercial company by the State Consumer Rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49465
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland
SEPCZYNSKI v. Poland POL 26/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention protection of property: Inadequate medical care in prison disproportionate interference due to the imposition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49467
SEVDARI v. Albania
SEVDARI v. Albania ALB 13/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate dismissal following a vetting procedure re evaluation of the credentials of a prosecutor and a lifetime ban from re entering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62937
SEVERE v. Austria
SEVERE v. Austria AUT 21/12/2017 00:00:00 09/02/2018 11:08:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48763
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande
SIGLFIRDINGUR EHF v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Absence of a possibility for the applicant company to have the imposition of a fine by the labour court reviewed. Article 2 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57
SISMANIDIS v. Greece
SISMANIDIS v. Greece GRC 09/09/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:57:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and ne bis in idem: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the administrative court adjudicating the lawfulness of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15383
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STANISLAV LUTSENKO (NO. 2) v. Ukraine
STANISLAV LUTSENKO NO. 2 v. Ukraine UKR 15/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the prisoner in 2008 leading to imposition of stricter prison regime and repeated prison transfers EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62240
STANKIEWICZ AND OTHERS v. Poland (no. 2)
STANKIEWICZ AND OTHERS v. Poland no. 2 POL 03/02/2016 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Imposition of sanctions in civil proceedings against journalists following the publication of three articles on a 2005 legislative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39897
STEFANEC v. the Czech Republic
STEFANEC v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Denial of access to the Constitutional Court which limited its consideration to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6198
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
TATAR AND FABER v. Hungary
TATAR AND FABER v. Hungary HUN 12/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition of an administrative sanction for hanging dirty laundry outside Parliament as a brief EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11086
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TSONYO TSONEV v. Bulgaria
TSONYO TSONEV v. Bulgaria BGR 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: Right not to be tried or punished twice: Imposition of an administrative fine and a sentence of 18 months imprisonment essentially for the same offence an initial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58419
TV VEST AS & ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway
TV VEST AS ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. Norway NOR 11/03/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Imposition of a fine on a television broadcasting company and a political party by the State Media Authority for breaching EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-203
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria
UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-819