Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARSLAN v. Turkey
ARSLAN v. Turkey TUR 08/07/1999 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due the applicants conviction by State Security Courts under former Article 8 of the Anti Terrorism Law following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5466
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
DJAVIT AN v. Turkey
DJAVIT AN v. Turkey TUR 09/07/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of assembly: Unlawful interference due to the authorities refusal to allow the applicant who is the Turkish Cypriot coordinator of the Movement for an Independent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5462
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland
EGILL EINARSSON v. Iceland ISL 07/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the dismissal of defamation proceedings brought by a public figure for the publication of a picture EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49139
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
ENACHE v. Romania
ENACHE v. Romania ROU 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/01/2018 13:37:31 Case Description: This case concerns the poor material conditions of detention of a life sentenced prisoner combined with isolation and systematic handcuffing whenever he left his cell due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13043
GHARIBASHVILI v. Georgia
GHARIBASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 29/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into the assault or into allegations of ill treatment during arrest or in custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5812
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the non motivated refusal of the competent authority the National Radio and Television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3829
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/05/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to the use of covert listening devices in residences or the workplace EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2464
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
JUHNKE v. Turkey
JUHNKE v. Turkey TUR 13/08/2008 00:00:00 09/11/2016 17:24:27 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to an imposed gynaecological examination without the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36004
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan
KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The application No. 65286/13 concerns violations of the rights of the applicant a renowned investigative journalist to respect for her private life and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52409
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria
KRUMPHOLZ v. Austria AUT 18/06/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Interference with the right to remain silent and the presumption of innocence due to the Independent Administrative Panel s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1149
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285