Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 4061 - 4080 of 4571
TEKIN AND ARSLAN v. Belgium
TEKIN AND ARSLAN v. Belgium BEL 05/12/2017 00:00:00 23/01/2018 11:19:34 Case Description: Right to life: Excessive use of force resulting in the death of a mentally ill prisoner after being restrained in a stranglehold by a prison officer. Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48745
TEL v. Turkey
TEL v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due the judicial authorities failure caused by lack of coordination and due diligence to consider that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49153
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
TELFNER v. Austria
TELFNER v. Austria AUT 20/06/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the conviction of the applicant in the context of a hit and run accident EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-857
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania
TELIATNIKOV v. Lithuania LTU 07/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified refusal in 2015 to exempt conscientious objector a Jehovah s witness from compulsory military service and the unavailability of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61139
TEMEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TEMEL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 23/09/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody. Article 5 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28779
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey TUR 23/08/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28609
TENCE v. Slovenia
TENCE v. Slovenia SVN 31/08/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court as an appeal sent by fax was rejected by domestic courts including the Supreme Court and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7322
TENDAM v. Spain
TENDAM v. Spain ESP 13/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Infringement of the presumption of innocence resulting in refusal to award compensation for pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5736
TEREBUS v. Portugal
TEREBUS v. Portugal PRT 10/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:15:57 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings and inability to obtain enforcement of the final judgment delivered in his favour. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10055
TERET v. Belgium
TERET v. Belgium BEL 15/02/2003 00:00:00 31/05/2017 11:02:42 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46899
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TERSHANA v. Albania
TERSHANA v. Albania ALB 04/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: The case concerns the ineffective investigation into the acid attack against the applicant. The applicant was disfigured as a result of a serious acid attack in 2009 by an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56331
TESIC v. Serbia
TESIC v. Serbia SRB 11/05/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the conviction of a pensioner to pay excessive damages and costs in civil defamation proceedings resulting in her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7061
TETE v. France
TETE v. France FRA 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for malicious falsehoods on account of an open letter which he had written to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55749
TEYMURAZYAN v. Armenia
TEYMURAZYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/06/2018 00:00:00 17/08/2018 09:58:33 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of possibilities to claim for compensation of non pecuniary damages suffered as a result of ill treatment and unlawful detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50093
THALER v. Austria
THALER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lacking independence and impartiality of Social Insurance Regional Appeals Commissions. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-557
THE ESTATE OF NITSCHKE v. Sweden
THE ESTATE OF NITSCHKE v. Sweden SWE 27/12/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of tax administrative proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2168
THE FORMER KING OF GREECE AND OTHERS v. Greece
THE FORMER KING OF GREECE AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 23/11/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:33:21 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the expropriation of private property without compensation. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-21590
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland FIN 15/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings as the applicant company was not allowed by Supreme Administrative Court to submit comments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4814