Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
A. v. the Netherlands
A. v. the Netherlands NLD 20/10/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of expulsion to Libya Status of Execution: On 10/11/2010 the Minister for Immigration Integration and Asylum Policy rejected the request for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4557
AL-NASHIF v. Bulgaria
AL NASHIF v. Bulgaria BGR 20/09/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Lack of protection against arbitrariness in expulsion proceedings based on national security grounds: failure of the authorities to ensure independent supervision of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14665
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BENES v. Austria
BENES v. Austria AUT 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of respective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45997
BIAO v. Denmark
BIAO v. Denmark DNK 24/05/2016 00:00:00 12/10/2016 18:12:08 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the applicants request for spousal reunification without compelling or weighty reasons in comparison to the more favourable conditions for family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17
D.A. AND OTHERS v. Italy
D.A. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 04/07/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of civil proceedings brought by the applicants or their deceased relatives seeking compensation for the damage they EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28310
DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. Belgium
DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. Belgium BEL 06/03/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Right to life and protection of rights in detention: Suicide of the applicants son while he was unlawfully detained in the ordinary wings of a prison in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1203
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DONNER v. Austria
DONNER v. Austria AUT 22/05/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in this respect. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1091
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. France
GEBREMEDHIN GABERAMADHIEN v. France FRA 26/07/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect as requested by the Convention to defend the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33047
GORANOVA-KARAENEVA v. Bulgaria
GORANOVA KARAENEVA v. Bulgaria BGR 08/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of private life and effective remedy: Lack of sufficient safeguards in domestic law against the risk of abuse inherent to secret surveillance systems EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4013
HASANBASIC v. Switzerland
HASANBASIC v. Switzerland CHE 07/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Refusal to renew the first applicant s settlement permit because of inter alia both applicants husband and wife dependence on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5866
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571
M.S.S. v. Greece
M.S.S. v. Greece GRC 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1219
MAIRE v. Portugal
MAIRE v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to enforce judicial decisions relating to the exercise by the applicant of custody of his child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9963