Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BRISC v. Romania
BRISC v. Romania ROU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 15:10:37 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s reprimand and consequent removal from the office of chief prosecutor in 2009 as a result of a disciplinary action instituted him on charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51829
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
FOGLIA v. Switzerland
FOGLIA v. Switzerland CHE 13/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the conviction of a practicing lawyer to a disciplinary fine on the basis of declarations made in the press and on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4732
FUENTES BOBO v. Spain
FUENTES BOBO v. Spain ESP 29/05/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference in the context of a labour dispute due to the dismissal of a television producer by the State television company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3475
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the non motivated refusal of the competent authority the National Radio and Television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3829
INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA v. Austria
INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA v. Austria AUT 28/11/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression and information: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant association s inability to obtain radio and television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-893
MAMERE v. France
MAMERE v. France FRA 07/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of a politician in criminal proceedings to pay a fine as well as damages for statements he made during a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33029
MATUZ v. Hungary
MATUZ v. Hungary HUN 21/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of a journalist s dismissal from the State television company for publishing a book criticising his employer in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10987
MELTEX LTD AND MOVSESYAN v. Armenia
MELTEX LTD AND MOVSESYAN v. Armenia ARM 17/09/2008 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the refusal by the National Television and Radio Commission NTRC on several occasions to deliver to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-417
RODINA v. Latvia
RODINA v. Latvia LVA 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the publication of the first applicant s family story in the newspaper and its subsequent broadcast EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55791
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
VGT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN v. Switzerland
VGT VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN v. Switzerland CHE 28/09/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal of the television authority to broadcast the applicant association s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4654