Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 821 - 840 of 1059
SAINT-PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. Luxembourg
SAINT PAUL LUXEMBOURG S.A. v. Luxembourg LUX 18/07/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with a newspaper company s right to respect for home and freedom of expression search and seizures in the offices of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-163
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal PRT 21/03/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life / discrimination: Interference and discriminatory treatment of the applicant on account of the domestic courts decision conferring on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9381
SALIHOGLU v. Turkey
SALIHOGLU v. Turkey TUR 21/01/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to criminal convictions to pay fines for possessing publications which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5604
SALONTAJI-DROBNJAK v. Serbia
SALONTAJI DROBNJAK v. Serbia SRB 13/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Exclusion from a final hearing in proceedings resulting in partial deprivation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7366
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway NOR 04/01/2008 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate und unjustified interference due to suspicions expressed in a court decision on the applicant s visiting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-189
SANOCKI v. Poland
SANOCKI v. Poland POL 17/10/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Civil convictions for defamation Status of Execution: Change of practice of domestic courts. The judgment was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18593
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia LVA 30/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to covert interception in of telephone conversations in the framework of the criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12674
SAPAN v. Turkey
SAPAN v. Turkey TUR 08/09/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference a result of an interim injunction for the seizure of a book without sufficient and relevant reasons. Article 10 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37328
SARNELLI v. Italy
SARNELLI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to inadequate compensation awarded for the expropriation of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44550
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SAVA v. Romania
SAVA v. Romania ROU 16/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions due to a 2006 final domestic court decision which maintained a rental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57065
SAVINY v. Ukraine
SAVINY v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified interference due to insufficient evidence or inadequate assessment of evidence for the decision to remove three children from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31846
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to the disclosure of the applicant s telephone records provided by the national landline EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47385
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SCEPANOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SCEPANOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 15/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate and sufficient guarantees satisfying the procedural requirements of the applicant s right to respect for his family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62080
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915
SCHEMBRI AND OTHERS v. Malta
SCHEMBRI AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 10/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Inability to institute actions in expropriation proceedings before the Land Arbitration EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4091
SCHIRMER v. Poland
SCHIRMER v. Poland POL 21/12/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts refusal to order the eviction of the applicant s tenant on the grounds that the applicant had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18189
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland
SCHLUMPF v. Switzerland CHE 05/06/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Unfair civil proceedings related to the reimbursement of sex change operation costs due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4752