Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia MKD 26/09/2019 00:00:00 03/10/2019 11:22:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of confiscation of his vehicle within the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52869
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 15/01/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The majority of the cases in this group concern deaths torture ill treatment excessive use of force or lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3943
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
SAKIK & OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKIK OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/11/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention due to the authorities failure to present the applicants promptly and automatically before a judge and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5470
SIMSEK v. Turkey
SIMSEK v. Turkey TUR 30/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention without any judicial review and impossibility to challenge speedily the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as he had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28579