Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 405
F.C.B. v. Italy
F.C.B. v. Italy ITA 28/08/1991 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of in absentia criminal proceedings due to impossibility of obtaining a fresh examination by a court of the merits of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45056
FAURE v. France
FAURE v. France FRA 15/04/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary arrest and detention on the basis of an arrest warrant issued by the Assize Court and not the investigating judge was thus not in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33039
FELIX GUTU v. the Republic of Moldova
FELIX GUTU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/01/2021 00:00:00 15/02/2021 16:49:34 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to the presumption of innocence in 2006 because of his dismissal for theft based on evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56679
FERNANDES PEDROSO v. Portugal
FERNANDES PEDROSO v. Portugal PRT 14/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: The case concerns a criminal investigation into a pedophile ring and in particular the pre trial detention of the applicant between May and October 2003 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50283
GABLISHVILI v. Russia
GABLISHVILI v. Russia RUS 26/09/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the right to respect for family life of the applicants foreigners whose status in Russia was regularised on account of their expulsion notably as a result of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14158
GAKHARIA v. Georgia
GAKHARIA v. Georgia GEO 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms and adversarial proceedings in the first case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46769
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia RUS 13/03/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful restrictions of the applicants right to liberty of movement in that in 1999 and 2000 they had not been permitted on a single occasion to enter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13599
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. France
GEBREMEDHIN GABERAMADHIEN v. France FRA 26/07/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect as requested by the Convention to defend the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33047
GEERINGS v. the Netherlands
GEERINGS v. the Netherlands NLD 01/06/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Presumption of innocence: Confiscation order of illegally obtained advantage in respect of criminal acts of which the applicant had been partially acquitted. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5950
GEMICI v. Turkey
GEMICI v. Turkey TUR 02/03/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to criminal convictions to pay fines for possessing publications which had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26832
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concern the failure of the national authorities to comply with numerous administrative court decisions delivered in favour of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47927
GHARIBASHVILI v. Georgia
GHARIBASHVILI v. Georgia GEO 29/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective investigations into the assault or into allegations of ill treatment during arrest or in custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5812
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria
GLAS NADEZHDA EOOD AND ANATOLIY ELENKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the non motivated refusal of the competent authority the National Radio and Television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3829
GLASS v. the United Kingdom
GLASS v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/06/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the administration of medical treatment to a child with mental and physical disabilities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2680
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA 'ALCAZ G.A.' v. the Republic of Moldova
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA ALCAZ G.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 01/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company s right to deduct the VAT it EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59821