Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 31
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia
A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. Latvia LVA 12/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering a publishing company to pay compensation for damages for the publication in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31136
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine
BALATSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to take a formal final decision in the proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31575
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
D.D. v. Lithuania
D.D. v. Lithuania LTU 09/07/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair guardianship proceedings concerning the mentally incapacitated applicant s request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4336
E.G. v. the Republic of Moldova
E.G. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: This case concerns breaches of the positive procedural obligations of the authorities to carry out the sentence imposed on the perpetrator of a sexual assault EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58191
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GANCO v. Lithuania
GANCO v. Lithuania LTU 13/07/2021 00:00:00 15/07/2021 10:21:13 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular during pre trial investigations. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58167
GEREKSAR v. Turkey
GEREKSAR v. Turkey TUR 01/05/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Expropriation on account of the construction of an airport on the applicants properties and failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37246
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia
JEVREMOVIC v. Serbia SRB 17/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of different types of judicial proceedings civil family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7031
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/05/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of adequate medical care in detention inadequate detention conditions or insufficient consideration of detainees state of health by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39907
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
LINGURAR v. Romania
LINGURAR v. Romania ROU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate use of force against the applicants during a police raid on a Roma 1 community in 2011 an operation found by the Court to disclose EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51929
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
M.C. AND A.C. v. Romania
M.C. AND A.C. v. Romania ROU 12/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the authorities to conduct an effective investigation including into possible homophobic motives of a physical and verbal attack on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13171