Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 321 - 340 of 700
KOLU v. Turkey
KOLU v. Turkey TUR 02/11/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicants convictions on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37214
KOMISSAROV v. the Czech Republic
KOMISSAROV v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns excessive length of the applicant s detention pending extradition lasting in 2016 2017 for eighteen months as a result of delays in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60317
KONTALEXIS v. Greece
KONTALEXIS v. Greece GRC 28/11/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to be heard by an impartial tribunal to the replacement of a judge without explicit reasoning in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15772
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative responsibility proceedings due to the lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the second EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31130
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOSTYUCHENKO v. Russia
KOSTYUCHENKO v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to impartial tribunal on account of that a judge of the regional court was not objectively impartial and independent when considering a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52437
KOTENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOTENKO AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2019 00:00:00 27/06/2019 16:34:02 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants which may have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52298
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KOZACIOGLU v. Turkey
KOZACIOGLU v. Turkey TUR 19/02/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to property on account of the value limits set in the Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Act Law no. 2863 with respect to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37146
KRNJAK v. Croatia
KRNJAK v. Croatia HRV 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:15:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to review the lawfulness of detention and failure to respect the principle of equality of arms in appeal proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12121
KUC v. Slovakia
KUC v. Slovakia SVK 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Insufficient justification for the applicant s pre trial detention failing to take into account the applicant s personal circumstances. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48145
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KUCHTA v. Poland
KUCHTA v. Poland POL 23/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s inability to sufficiently or appropriately challenge witness statements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49391
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland POL 21/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Lack of access to a court due to a legal aid lawyer s refusal to lodge a cassation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18277
KURLOWICZ v. Poland
KURLOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of this group concern violations of the right to freedom of expression Article 10 due to the applicants politicians journalists or editors criminal conviction to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20608
KVARTUC v. Croatia
KVARTUC v. Croatia HRV 18/02/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of enforcement proceedings and in one case lack of an effective remedy. Article 6 1 and 13 Other violations: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10077
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus
KYPRIANOU v. Cyprus CYP 15/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:41:38 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings: Lack of impartiality of a tribunal sentencing the applicant an advocate to 5 days imprisonment in 2001 for contempt of court while he was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12607
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213