Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 421 - 440 of 700
MITKUS v. Latvia
MITKUS v. Latvia LVA 02/01/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection against ill treatment and of private life: Lack of an adequate investigation notably by the Office of the Prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12638
MITRESKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
MITRESKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 25/06/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms by not serving on the applicant the appeal filed by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6542
MITRINOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
MITRINOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 30/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to lacking objective and subjective impartiality in misconduct EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6578
MIZIGAROVA v. Slovakia
MIZIGAROVA v. Slovakia SVK 14/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the health and well being of the applicant s husband of Roma origin who allegedly committed suicide while in police EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8003
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. Romania
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 17/09/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:43:15 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicant s husband and the ill treatment suffered by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15145
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
MOCANU AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: This case concerns the expropriation by the State in 2004 of agricultural land belonging to the applicants with a view to building a section of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50347
MOCARSKA v. Poland
MOCARSKA v. Poland POL 06/02/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Unlawful provisional detention in a remand centre pending the applicants admission to a psychiatric hospital. Status of Execution: Applicants were placed in psychiatric EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18877
MOISEYEV v. Russia
MOISEYEV v. Russia RUS 06/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns lack of independence and impartiality of judges on account of breach of the principle of immutability of judges Article 6 1 restrictions of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13559
MOKRUSHINA v. Russia
MOKRUSHINA v. Russia RUS 12/02/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing mostly in civil cases due to the applicants absence without proper notification. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13627
MOMCILOVIC v. Serbia
MOMCILOVIC v. Serbia SRB 02/07/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 08:41:55 Case Description: Denial of the right to a fair trial in civil proceedings due to unlawful composition of the Supreme Court s bench: Instead of the prescribed panel of seven judges the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13491
MOULIN v. France
MOULIN v. France FRA 23/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Appearance before the deputy public prosecutor two days after arrest and placement in police custody is not an appearance before a competent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33291
MUCHA v. Slovakia
MUCHA v. Slovakia SVK 04/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: The case concerns objectively justified doubts as to the court s impartiality in the criminal proceedings against the applicant in 2012 2019 because of its earlier judgments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60193
MUSHTA v. Ukraine
MUSHTA v. Ukraine UKR 18/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the application of unclear and unforeseeable procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31769
MUSLIJA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MUSLIJA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 14/04/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: Ne bis in idem: Second trial by domestic criminal courts for an offence for which the applicant had already been convicted in prior minor offences proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3155
MUSLUM CIFTCI v. Turkey
MUSLUM CIFTCI v. Turkey TUR 02/05/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and association: Disproportionate interference due to the transfer of the applicants civil servants to other provinces as a sanction in disciplinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37228
MUSO v. Italy (no. 1)
MUSO v. Italy no. 1 ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 13:59:35 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and 8 in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38166
MUSTAFA AND ARMAGAN AKIN v. Turkey
MUSTAFA AND ARMAGAN AKIN v. Turkey TUR 06/07/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 17:12:59 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of domestic courts to take into account in custody proceedings a divorced father s and his children s best EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37500
MUSTAFA v. Bulgaria
MUSTAFA v. Bulgaria BGR 28/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: This case concerns the conviction of the applicant a civilian at first and second instance by military courts whereas the Supreme Court of Cassation which considered the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54947
MYRSKYY v. Ukraine
MYRSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Failure of domestic courts to give relevant and sufficient reasons for findings that certain critical statements made by the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31524
N.TS. AND OTHERS v. Georgia
N.TS. AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 02/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the children s right to respect for their family and private life on account of the flawed representation and as a consequence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5892