Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 501 - 520 of 700
PAROL v. Poland
PAROL v. Poland POL 11/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Lack of access to a court on account of the dismissal of the applicant s appeal in 2013 as inadmissible following unduly restrictive application by domestic courts of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51637
PASCALE v. Croatia
PASCALE v. Croatia HRV 22/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to property due to the confiscation for failing to declare money at the border of the sums EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61239
PEKARNY A CUKRARNY KLATOVY, A.S. v. the Czech Republic
PEKARNY A CUKRARNY KLATOVY A.S. v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Supreme Court due to its dismissal of a company s appeals against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6378
PEREIRA DA SILVA v. Portugal
PEREIRA DA SILVA v. Portugal PRT 12/09/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of objective impartiality of the Supreme Administrative Court plenary formation as four of its seven EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8799
PEROTE PELLON v. Spain
PEROTE PELLON v. Spain ESP 25/10/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of impartiality of a military court as two of its judges sat in the chamber EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3477
PERUS v. Slovenia
PERUS v. Slovenia SVN 27/12/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to an impartial tribunal on account of the fact that the same judge participated in two stages of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7416
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation when assessing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6834
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETROVIC v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
PETROVIC v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of restitution proceedings before administrative bodies Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47829
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
PFEIFER v. Austria
PFEIFER v. Austria AUT 15/02/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure by domestic courts to protect the applicant s reputation against defamatory statements published by the chief editor in a domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-479
PIAZZI v. Italy
PIAZZI v. Italy ITA 02/02/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of juvenile courts and social services to make sufficient and adequate efforts to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28276
PIETRIS S.A. AND NASTAS v. the Republic of Moldova
PIETRIS S.A. AND NASTAS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 19/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the refusal of domestic courts to examine the applicants claim failing his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56893
PINKAS AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PINKAS AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 30/01/2023 00:00:00 13/02/2023 14:31:45 Case Description: The case concerns the discrimination of the applicant judicial clerks on account of their unjustified difference in treatment by domestic courts vis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62651
PLASSE-BAUER v. France
PLASSE BAUER v. France FRA 28/05/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:59:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of sufficient efforts to enforce a domestic court decision awarding visiting rights to a mother and laying down the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31804
PLECHANOW v. Poland
PLECHANOW v. Poland POL 07/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Failure to comply with positive obligation to provide measures safeguarding the applicants right to the effective enjoyment of their possession: impossibility to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39901
PLOSKI v. Poland
PLOSKI v. Poland POL 12/02/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to grant detainees leave to attend their parents funerals. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17761
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova
PLOTNICOVA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/08/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to a fair hearing in criminal proceedings against her lasting from 2003 06 on two accounts: absence of any decision by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7156
POLAT v. Austria
POLAT v. Austria AUT 20/10/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference on account of the postmortem examination of the applicant s baby carried out against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58807
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407